Real Estate

Government Taking of Property

How much power does the government have to claim ownership over your private land?
Updated by Brian Farkas, Attorney · Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Updated: Oct 23rd, 2023
Why Trust Us?
Why Trust Us?

An experienced team of legal writers and editors researches, drafts, edits, and updates the articles in the Understand Your Issue section of Lawyers.com. Each contributor has either a law degree or independently established legal credentials. Learn more about us.

Could your land and home be taken from you outright, even when you had no intention of selling or leaving it? Under some circumstances, unfortunately, the short answer is “yes.” Something called "eminent domain" power allows a government entity to take private land for public use. Also sometimes referred to as the power of condemnation or a "forced sale," this is within the legal toolkit of federal, state, local, and even quasi-governmental agencies and public utilities.

While each jurisdiction has its own laws and procedures regarding the taking of private property, many of the broad concepts are the same across the United States, as we'll describe below.



The concept of eminent domain predates the United States’s founding. Throughout European history, sovereigns have claimed the right to use any land within their borders. The American Constitution, written after the country escaped British monarchic rule, did attempt to create some protections for citizens against government overreach.

In particular, the Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights provides that “[no] private property [shall] be taken for public use without just compensation.”

This has been interpreted to mean that the federal, state, or local government entity that wants to take a private person’s land must offer to pay that person the reasonable market rate of the property. Put another way, the government cannot snatch land for free, or pay the owner only a nominal fee. (That can be small comfort, however.)

Different states have placed additional requirements on eminent domain’s use, even beyond this foundational constitutional protection.

The government’s taking must be for a “public use.” Most commonly, this means that the government wants to build a road, school, or other public facility on that particular private parcel of land, or a portion of it. Courts tend to define “public use” broadly, to include government uses that would not necessarily be available to the entire public, such as a government office building or army base, or even urban renewal.

It is difficult for property owners to challenge the government’s ability to take a parcel of land, as long as the government can make some rational argument for how the intended use will benefit the public.

The Process of a Government Taking

How does the government actually go about taking private property? Normally, the process will begin with a notice of the government’s interest in taking the property. This will sometimes be served on the landowner personally (by a process server), or sometimes be sent by mail, depending on the relevant regulations.

The notice will probably inform you that the government intends to appoint an appraiser to determine the fair market value of your property. The appraiser’s determination will form the basis of the “just compensation” that the Constitution requires be paid.

The appraisal will typically take into consideration a variety of factors about the property’s condition, location, improvements, natural resources, and broader market conditions. In theory, the valuation should approximate the amount of money you would likely be able to command on the private market if you attempted to sell.

You can accept the government appraiser’s amount, and release your land. Alternatively, you can dispute the government appraiser’s valuation, and hire your own appraiser. While you will still be forced to give up the land, you can at least sue the government and show evidence of why you believe the land’s value is more than whatever number the government offered to pay. Such evidence might include the reports of one or more appraisers, market surveys, or other presentations of value. The judge or jury, as the finder of fact, will determine the proper value.

Types of Property Takings

Not all government takings involve the total confiscation of your land. There are different forms of taking property. A taking could be complete, where the property and all rights connected to it are taken, or partial, where the government takes only a portion of a parcel of land (for example, land that's needed to widen a road or lay a cable).

Easements (the right to use someone else's property), such as utility easements, are also a form of taking. Temporary taking is possible, for example, if control of or access to much of your property is needed during a government construction project.

Note that the fact that the government’s taking is partial or temporary does not relieve it of the obligation to give you “just compensation.” You are still entitled to some form of payment for that use of your property.

Opposing the Government’s Taking of Property

While it is difficult to challenge the government’s ability to take your land, it is common for property owners to challenge the amount of money the government is obligated to pay. Knowing your options when faced with an eminent domain case is critical. An eminent domain lawyer is often a necessity in adequately protecting your interests in public hearings.

A lawyer can also advise you on your rights and the law if you pursue other options, such as community action. Sometimes (if a large area of land is affected), organized communities or lobbying groups can potentially convince the government to alter a project or lessen its burden on owners. These types of battles are typically fought through the media, putting pressure on elected officials, rather than through the courts. Again, an experienced eminent domain attorney might have suggestions for exploring all of your options.

Brian Farkas Attorney · Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Brian Farkas is an associate attorney at Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP in New York, focusing his practice on commercial litigation, arbitration and intellectual property.

Get Professional Help

Find a Real Estate lawyer
Practice Area:
Zip Code:
How It Works
  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Connect with local attorneys
NEED PROFESSIONAL HELP?

Talk to an attorney

How It Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Choose attorneys to contact you